Our desire is to
achieve natural music reproduction: a dynamic, neutral speaker
with full bass bandwidth was essential.
After extensive
development and listening tests, backed up by sound engineering
principles and measurements, we arrived at the open dipole configuration.
We found other types of speaker loading lacking or flawed, whatever
their supposed virtues.
Arguably, boxes
hinder the most natural sound reproduction.
We all listen to
hifi in a room: we test our speakers in a room environment. Room
effects cause major audible peaks and troughs in the low frequencies.
Room effects are
unavoidable. Speaker drivers in boxes, regardless of design or
cost, exacerbate the effect. Most listeners become conditioned
to bass that is flawed.
The acoustic properties
of dipole bass eliminate much of this undesirable room coupling.
Almost by definition, dipole bass does not sound boomy or constrained.
It may sound quieter than usual despite being flat
from 20Hz up as in the Segovia Trueno system.
A
dipole speaker has neither cabinet resonances nor high pressures
to excite panels. Bass drivers are not compromised and there is
an absence of port and non-linear compression effects, internal
reflected waves and the usual problems caused by enclosing drivers
in boxes.
Heavy, braced, non-parallel
walls and other methods of
cabinet construction are
necessary to deal with just
these problems in conventional speaker cabinets.
Dipole speakers are uncommon. Implementation
requires exceptional drivers. They have to move much more air
for realistic sound levels due to out of phase cancellation. Non-linearity
cannot be tolerated and there is little opportunity to damp an
unruly response. Such drivers come at a price.
We like true ribbon tweeters as no other
type can match their smooth effortless characteristics with a
response up to 40kHz.
Where cost precludes ribbons, we use membrane
tweeters which have similar virtues.